International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 24
Vol. 24
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 23
Vol. 23
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 22
Vol. 22
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 21
Vol. 21
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 20
Vol. 20
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 19
Vol. 19
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 18
Vol. 18
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 17
Vol. 17
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 16
Vol. 16
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 15
Vol. 15
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 14
Vol. 14
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 13
Vol. 13
International Letters of Natural Sciences
Vol. 12
Vol. 12
International Letters of Natural Sciences Vol. 18
Paper Title Page
Abstract: Farmers often rely on the physical appearance of rubber tree seedlings to decipher on growth rate. In situations of doubt especially when there is obvious reduction in chlorophyll or coax decay of roots, the most likely situation is induction by flooding. A sound nursery management technique which is both responsive to continuous monitoring of the terrain and also able to generate data for restoration is most desired. This study therefore employs a geospatial technique whereby topographical survey was used to pick field data while Geographical Information System analyses was able to generate accurate information on areas likely to both surface and underground discharge of materials. This method was also able to sum up all affected areas, alongside other attributes like the direction of surface flow and the rate of discharge.
100
Abstract: Cytotaxanomical analysis carried out on three ornamental aroids (Anchomanes difformis, Anchomanes hookeri and Arum maculatum) proved that cytological studies is none negligible tool in phylogeny and scientific classificationns of plants. Aceto-orcein stain squash technique was used in this study. Anchomanes difformis and Anchomanes. hookeri showed more relatedness in chromosome number and chromosome morphology, sharing the same chromosome number 2n=13, while Arum maculatum has 2n=8. The following karyotypes formular were revealed: 2n=8=3M+3SM+2ST in Arum maculatum; 2n=13=5M+1SM+7ST in A. difformis; and 2n=13=3M+6SM+4 A. hookeri. Other karyotype parameters investigated like CI%, AsI and degree of asymmetry of the genomes supported current taxonomic ranking
105