Assessment of Bird Diversity as Bioindicators in Two Parks, Kolkata, India

Article Preview

Abstract:

The trees of parks and gardens support many species, the survival of urban-dwelling species mainly bird species. Birds amongst other species provide a wide range of environmental and social functions to cities and urban dwellers. The present study aims to know bird diversity in two parks as bioindicator of automobile air pollution exposure, landscape changes and/or human interactions. The study areas were selected as per heavily-populated neighborhoods, nearby office buildings, nearby roads and continuous vehicular movements, human interactions as visitors, where high levels of human disturbance are common. The study was carried out at 2 sampling stations viz (i) Elliot park and (ii) Agri-horticulture Society. The bird species diversity was studied by qualitative and quantitative assessment. Indices were Species richness, Index of Dominance, Relative abundance, Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index and Evenness Index for birds for all selected sites were calculated using the statistical formulae. The present results as bioindicators bird species clearly indicate that the bird species are very few in numbers in both the parks. When comparison made between both the parks, it was observed less number of bird varieties (16 types) in Elliot park than varieties (9 types) more less in number in Agri-horticulture society. This study is a preliminary assessment of bird diversity but further researches are needed in relation to biochemical and genetic damage study as well as air pollution load by using instruments. In the present study it was concluded that the less numbers of birds and their different diversity indices were found a decreasing trends, though there no attempt has been made on physico-chemical properties of present air pollutants. The less number of varieties of bird species are as tolerant bioindicators, which may be due to the vehicular pollution and/or human interference and/or landscape changes due to nearby neighborhood blocks, office and residential buildings, continuous movement of vehicles etc

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Belskii E.A., Bezel V.S., Lyakhov A.G., Russ J Ecol 26 (1995) 126-131.

Google Scholar

[2] Belskii E.A., Lugas'kova, N.V., Karfidova A.A., Russ J Ecol 36 (2005) 329-335.

Google Scholar

[3] Berglund Å.M.M., Sturve J., Förlin L., Nyholm N.E.I., Environ Res 105 (2007) 330-339.

Google Scholar

[4] Blair R.B., Ecol Appl 9 (1999) 164-170.

Google Scholar

[5] Citizen's Report, Centre of Science and Environment (2011) 1-106.

Google Scholar

[4] Clergeau P., Savard J.-P.L., Mennechez G., Falardeau G., Condor 100(3) (1998) 413-425.

Google Scholar

[5] Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot S., Farber M., Grasso B., Hannon B., Limburg S., O'Neil N.R., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M., Nature 387 (1997) 253-260.

DOI: 10.1038/387253a0

Google Scholar

[6] CPCB, Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, (2009). http://www.cpcb.nic. in/bulletin /del/2009html.

Google Scholar

[7] Dauwe T., Eens M., Naturwissenschaften 95 (2008) 969-973.

Google Scholar

[8] Dueñas A.H., Pineda J., Antonio M.T., Aguirre J.I., Ecological Indicators 42 (2014) 6-9.

Google Scholar

[9] Eeva T., Ahola M., Laaksonen T., Lehikoinen E., Oecologia 157 (2008) 231-238.

Google Scholar

[10] Eeva T., Ahola M., Lehikoinen E., Env Polln 157 (2009) 126-131.

Google Scholar

[11] Eeva T., Hakkarainen H., Belskii E., Env Polln 157(2009) 1857-1861.

Google Scholar

[12] Eeva T. ,Lehikoinen E., Écoscience 5 (1998) 46-50.

Google Scholar

[13] Eeva T., Lehikoinen E., Rönkä M., Functional Ecol 12 (1998) 607-612.

Google Scholar

[14] Eeva T., Ryömä M., Riihimäki J., Oecologia 145 (2005) 629-639.

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0145-x

Google Scholar

[15] Geens A., Dauwe T., Eens M., Comp Biochm Physiol 150 (2009) 155-163.

Google Scholar

[16] Grimmett R., Roberts T., Inskipp T., Helm Field Guides. Yale University Press (2001).

Google Scholar

[17] Hadidian J., Sauer J., Swarth C., Handly D., Droege S., Williams C., Huff J., Didden G., Urban Ecosystems 1(2) (1997) 87-102.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1018563125184

Google Scholar

[18] Hobson, K.A., Oecologia 120 (1999) 314-326.

Google Scholar

[19] Hobson K.A., Rempel R., The Saskat-chewan For Impacts Monitoring Scientific Advisory Board (2001).

Google Scholar

[20] Hutton M., Goodman G.T., Environ Pollun Ser A 22 (1980) 207-217.

Google Scholar

[21] Isaksson C., McLaughlin P., Monaghan P., Andersson S., Functional Ecol 21 (2007) 1123-1129.

Google Scholar

[22] Isaksson C., Von Post M., Andersson S., Biol J Linnean Soc 92 (2007) 521-527.

Google Scholar

[23] Janiga M., Žemberyová M., Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35 (1998) 70-74.

Google Scholar

[24] Li M. H., Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45 (2003) 168-176.

Google Scholar

[25] Mazza L., Rydin, Y., Prog Plann 47 (1997) 1-74.

Google Scholar

[26] McPherson E.G., D.J. Nowak, Rowntree R.A., United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE- 1 (1994) 86.

Google Scholar

[27] Melles S., Glenn S., Martin K., Conserv Ecol 7(1) (2003) 5.

Google Scholar

[28] Marzluff J.M., Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Avian ecology in an urbanizing world (eds. J. M. Marzluff, R. Bowman and R. Donnelly). Norwell, M. A. Kluwer Academic, (2001) pp.19-47.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_2

Google Scholar

[29] Mirza Z.B., EDRC, WWF – P (2007).

Google Scholar

[30] Navarro A., Benítez H., El dominio del aire, La Ciencia desde México, (138), Fondo de Cultura Económica, , A., Benitez, H, Mastering Air. 216. Science from Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Economica SEP- CONACYT 138 (1995).

DOI: 10.1017/s0022050700017666

Google Scholar

[31] Newton I., J Anim Ecol 64 (1995) 675-696.

Google Scholar

[32] Niemelä, J., Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research Supplementum 3 (2001) 70-78.

Google Scholar

[33] Orians G.H., Lowenthal D., Meaning and values in landscape (1986).

Google Scholar

[34] Palmer M. et al., Science 304 (2004) 1251-1252.

Google Scholar

[35] Padoa-Schioppa, E. M. Baietto, R. Massa, L. Bottoni, Ecol Indicators 6 (2006) 83-93.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.006

Google Scholar

[36] Padoa-Schioppa, E. P. Digiovinazzo, L. Bottoni, In Bunce, R.G.H., Jongman, R.H.G., Hojas L., Weel, S., IALE World Congress 1 (2007) 274.

Google Scholar

[37] Sandstrom U.G., Angelstama P., Mikusinski B.G., Landscape Urban Planning 77 (2006) 39-53.

Google Scholar

[38] Sanesi G., Chiarello F., Urban Forestry Urban Greening 4 (2006) 125-134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.001

Google Scholar

[39] Savard J-P.L., Clergeaub P., Mennechezb G., Landscape and Urban Planning 48 (2000) 131-142.

Google Scholar

[40] Sidra S., Ali Z., Chaudhry M.N., Pak J Zool 45(4) (2013) 1069-1082.

Google Scholar

[41] Stiling P., Ecology: Theories and Applications (3rd ed) (1999) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Google Scholar

[42] Strohbach M.W, Haase, D., Kabisch, N., Ecology and Society 14 (2) (2009) 31.

Google Scholar

[43] Tanveer A., Shahzad, M., Chaudhry, A.A., Pak J Zool 17 (2002) 35-51.

Google Scholar

[44] Tiwary V.M., Joy of bird watching 1st Ed (2002) 1-287.

Google Scholar

[45] Tratalos J., Fuller R.A., Evans K.L., Davies R.G., Newson S.E., Greenwood J.J.D., Gaston K.J., Global Change Biol 13(8) (2007a) 1685-1695.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01390.x

Google Scholar

[46] Tratalos J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G., Gaston, K.J., Landscape and Urban Planning 83(4) (2007b) 308-317.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003

Google Scholar

[47] Trivedi S., Agrawal M., Rajput M., Indian J Air Poll Cont 3 (2003) 44-53.

Google Scholar

[48] Turner W.R., Landscape Urban Plann 65 (2002) 149-166.

Google Scholar

[49] Turner W. R., Nakamura T., Dinetti M.,  BioScience 54(6) (2004) 585-590.

Google Scholar

[50] Yokohari M., Takeuchi K., Watanabe T., Yokota S., Landscape Urban Planning 47 (2000) 159-171. ( Received 17 May 2014; accepted 25 May 2014 )

Google Scholar