Characterization and Analyses of Hydrophobic Clusters, Acetylation and Myristoylation Sites in Plant Glutathione Peroxidase Sequences

Article Preview

Abstract:

Incomplete reduction of oxygen molecules is the primary source for the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during cytosolic metabolism or mitochondrial respiration. These phenomenons may be as a result of biotic or abiotic stress. Exposure to exogenous stimuli such as radiation might be an alternative pathway of ROS production. Thus plants require counter defense strategies to combat the increase of this toxic molecular build up in its cell cytoplasm. As a result they have devised an army of free radical scavenging enzymes which enable them to dissipate the oxidative stress imposed by the accumulation of these toxic moieties. Glutathione Peroxidase forms an important part of this arms race along with several catalases and organelle specific enzymes such as superoxide dismutase. Plant glutathione peroxidases (GPXs) have been studied exclusively for their evolutionary lineages since they represent a hybrid class of molecules in context of the presence and absence of selenocysteine at their catalytic centres, the former situation predominant in non vascular plant groups while the later a predominant feature of vascular plants. This analysis focuses on three important aspects of protein structure analyses – hydrophobic cluster analyses for identification of homologues, and acetylation and myristoylation sites which provide us with information regarding the post translational modifications of a particular protein group. Specific patterns of clusters along with acetylation and myristoylation site frequencies were obtained which indicate that GPXs of non vascular plant members possess less chances of getting myristoylated while acetylation was predominant in most land plant lineages but absent in aquatic members.

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Beeor-Tzahar T., Ben-Hayyim G., Holland D., Faltin Z., Eshdat Y., FEBS Lett. 366 (1995) 151-155.

DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00521-a

Google Scholar

[2] Callebaut I., Labesse G., Durand P., Poupon A., Canard L., Chomilier J., Henrissat B, Mornon JP., Cell Mol Life Sci 53 (1997) 621-645.

DOI: 10.1007/s000180050082

Google Scholar

[3] Chothia C., Lesk AM., EMBO J 5 (1986) 823-826.

Google Scholar

[4] Edwards R., Physiol Plant 98 (1996) 594-604.

Google Scholar

[5] Eshdat Y., Holland D., Faltin Z., Ben-Hayyim G., Physiol. Plant. 100 (1997) 234-240.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1000204.x

Google Scholar

[6] Foyer C.H., Noctor G., Plant Cell 17 (2005) 1866-1875.

Google Scholar

[7] Gaboriaud C, Bissery V, Benchetrit T, Mornon JP. (1987). FEBS Lett ;224:149–155

DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80439-8

Google Scholar

[8] Ganguli S., Datta A., Annual Research & Review in Biology 24(4) (2014) 3810-3815.

Google Scholar

[9] Gechev T.S., Van Breusegem F., Stone J.M., Denev I., Laloi C., Bioessays 28 (2006) 1091-1101.

DOI: 10.1002/bies.20493

Google Scholar

[10] Gueta-Dahan Y., Yaniv Z., Zilinskas BA., Ben-Hayyim G., Planta 203 (1997) 460-469.

DOI: 10.1007/s004250050215

Google Scholar

[11] Halliwell B., Plant Physiol. 141 (2006) 312-322.

Google Scholar

[12] Herbette S., Roeckel-Drevet P., Drevet J.R., FEBS J. 274 (2007) 2163-2180.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05774.x

Google Scholar

[13] Jung B.G., Lee K.O., Lee S.S., Chi Y.H., Jang H.H., Kang S.S., J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 12572-12578.

Google Scholar

[14] Navrot N., Collin V., Gualberto J., Gelhaye E., Hirasawa M., Rey P., et al., Plant Physiol. 142 (2006) 1364-1379.

DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.089458

Google Scholar

[15] Pesaresi P, Gardner NA, Masiero S, Dietzmann A, Eichacker L, Wickner R, Salamini F, Leister D., Plant Cell 15 (2003) 1817-1832.

DOI: 10.1105/tpc.012377

Google Scholar

[16] Pierre M, Traverso JA, Boisson B, Domenichini S, Bouchez D, Giglione C, Meinnel T., The Plant Cell 19 (2007) 2804-2821.

DOI: 10.1105/tpc.107.051870

Google Scholar

[17] Potikha T.S., Collins C.C., Johnson D.I., Delmer D.P., Levine A., Plant Physiol. 119 (1999) 849-858.

Google Scholar

[18] Sabeh F., Wright T., Norton S.J., Enzyme Protein 47 (1993) 92-98.

Google Scholar

[19] Ursini F., Maiorino M., Roveri A., Biomed. Environ. Sci. 10 (1997) 327-332.

Google Scholar

[20] Willekens H, Chamnongpol S, Davey M, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, Van Montagu M, Inz e D, Van Camp W., EMBO J 16 (1997) 4806-4816. ( Received 18 October 2014; accepted 27 October 2014 )

Google Scholar