Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated Soil Using Sesbania sesabn L

Thangavel Mahakavi; L. Baskaran; R. Bakiyaraj; Ravi Mycin

doi:10.56431/p-sk91n6

Paper Titles

Isolating Wine Yeasts that are Specific to the Apold Region and Identifying them through RFLP Genetic Methods
p.10

The Use of Soil Parameters in Predicting Weed Infestation in Maize (Zea mays L.)
p.15

Fruiting Phenology of a Scrub Forest in Thiruporur, Eastern Ghats, India
p.25

Study on Buffering Capacity and Organic Matter of some Soil Samples from Rungicherra Tea-Estate, Bangladesh
p.31

Role of Growth Regulators on In Vitro Callus Induction and Direct Regeneration in Physalis minima Linn
p.38

Lura - Indigenous Approach to Biodiversity Conservation by Temporary Community Confinement of Mithuns (Bos frontalis) during Growing Season
p.45

Primary Productivity of Kumshi Reservoir, Kalaburagi District, Karnataka
p.53

Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated Soil Using Sesbania sesabn L
p.59

The Effect of a Period of Physical Exercise in Water on the Knee Osteoarthritis in Old Men
p.64

HomeInternational Letters of Natural SciencesInternational Letters of Natural Sciences Vol. 44Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated...

Phytoremediation of Quizlofop-Ethyl Contaminated Soil Using Sesbania sesabn L

Abstract:

In this field experiments, sandy loam soil was treated with different concentration of herbicide (Quizalofop-ethyl) 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 per cent. Sesbania sesban L. seeds were sown in all treated soil. The germination percentage, morphological and enzymes activities were measured after 20, 40 and 120 days. The results indicate that the germination per cent, morphological parameters were increased in control then it was gradually decreased with increasing the herbicide concentration. The enzymes like catalase and peroxidase activity were increased in control then it was decreased with increasing the concentration. Whereas the polyphenoloxidase acticity was lower in control and it was increased with increasing the herbicides concentration. Hence, after 120 days plants were harvested and the plant powder was analyzed for absorption of herbicide by plant with the help of Gas chromatography mass spectrum (GCMS). The obtained data showed that herbicide absorption was concerned in quiazalofop-ethyl treated plant when compared to control. This study expose that herbicide reduced by Sesbania sesban L.

By email View Pdf

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 44)

Pages:

59-63

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56431/p-sk91n6

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2015

Authors:

Thangavel Mahakavi, L. Baskaran, R. Bakiyaraj, Ravi Mycin

Keywords:

Morphological, Polyphenoloxidase, Quizalofop-Ethyl, Sesbania sesban

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

Citation:

References

[1] Machly, A.C. and Chance V, 1967. Methods of biochemical analysis. In: Glick D. (Ed.) Inter-Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp.357-824.

Google Scholar

[2] Kumar K.B and Khan P.A, 1982. Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in excised ragi Eleusine coracana (V. PR 202) leaves during senescence. Ind. J. Exp. Bot., 20: 412-416.

DOI: 10.1016/0531-5565(83)90019-0

Google Scholar

[3] Korade DL and Fulekar MH., 2009. Biology and Medicine, 1 (1): 28-34.

Google Scholar

[4] Rai S, P Trivedi, A.K Singh, Ritul kamal, Mohd. Haris Siddiqui, Sarika Malik and L P Srivastava., 2014. IJAR, 2(10) 489-497.

Google Scholar

[5] Chahid K, Laglaoui A, Zentar S, Ennabili A, 2013.American.J.Envi. Prot, 2(6): 149-153.

Google Scholar

[6] Santhoshkumar M, Baskaran L, Mahakavi T and Ravi mycin T, 2015. J.Environ. Treat.Tech, 3(1): 25-27.

Google Scholar

[7] Mahakavi, Bakiyaraj R, Baskaran L, Nusrat Rashid, Sankar Ganesh K, 2014. Int.L.Natural Sci. 4:58-65

Google Scholar

[8] Sammaiah D,Chandra Shekar CH, Ramkrishna Prasad V and Jaganmohan Reddy K, 2011. Int.J.Pharma.and Bio.Sci, 2(1):374-384.

Google Scholar

[9] Mishra I. P, Sabat G, and Mohanty B.K, 2014. I.J.A.B.R, 4(3): 265-270.

Google Scholar

[10] Kengar Y. D, Kamble A. B and Sabale A. B, 2014. Ann.Biol.Rese, 5 (5):89-92.

Google Scholar

[11] Chauhan S. S, Agrawal S and Srivastava A, 2013. Asian.J.Pharm.Clin.Res, 6(3):114-117.

Google Scholar

[12] Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I, 1998. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:643-668.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643

Google Scholar

[13] Dietz A.C and Schnoor J.L, 2001. Advances in phytoremediation. Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 163–168.

DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109s1163

Google Scholar

[14] Doty, S.L. 2007. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. U.S.A. 104, 16816–16821.

Google Scholar