Biomonitoring Tool: Morphological Anomalies in Zygnema sp. of Ganga River Bank

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present study aims to detect morphological abnormalities in Zygnema sp. because this test species have high adaptive capacity in unfavourable environmental stress. This alga is inhabited at the suburban bank of river Ganga, West Bengal, India. The study was done at experimental sites, downstream at Khardah near sewage water mixing area was compared with upstream control site Kalyani as no sewage water discharge. External and internal abnormal morphology such as undulating or wavy and extra outgrowth on cell wall, sometimes bending inwardly and outwardly as external deformities while internal anomalies such as pigment loss, nucleus was in circular, rectangular, oval and amoeboid shapes, also vacuolated and trilobed, broom like chloroplasts and central part of the thallas dried in between two segments. It was observed that this test species was surviving and well adapted with above mentioned deformities. The present preliminary study with Zygnema sp. can be utilized for in situ and ex situ indicator species for riverine biomonitoring. Further research may be relevant to know both tolerant and sensitive algae species inhabited at the river Ganga bank alongwith biochemical and genetic parameters. The present work is suggesting that other inhabiting algae and this adaptive test species can be used for bioremediation of pollutants.

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Aggarwal D.K., Gaur S.D., Tiwari I.C., Narayanaswami M.S., Marwali S.M. Indian Journal of Environmental Health 18 (1976) 201-206.

Google Scholar

[2] Ahluwalia A.S., Kaur M., Dua S. Indian Journal of Environmental Health 31 (1989) 112-119.

Google Scholar

[3] Cattaneo A., Couillard Y., Wunsam S., Courcelles M. Journal of Paleolimnology 32 (2004) 163-175.

DOI: 10.1023/b:jopl.0000029430.78278.a5

Google Scholar

[4] Chalotra P., Gaind M., Anand V.K. International Journal of Science and Knowledge 2 (1) (2013) 14-25.

Google Scholar

[5] Diwedi S. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 4 (2010) 11-26.

Google Scholar

[6] Falasco E., Bona F., Badino G., Hoffmann L., Ector L. Hydrobiologia 623 (2009a) 1-35.

DOI: 10.1007/s10750-008-9687-3

Google Scholar

[7] Falasco E., Bona F., Ginepro M., Hlúbiková Hoffmann L., Ector L. Water SA 35 (2009b) 595-605.

DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v35i5.49185

Google Scholar

[8] Gómez N., Licursi M. Nova Hedwigia 77 (2003) 389-398.

Google Scholar

[9] Halder N. Cibtech Journal of Bio-Protocols 4 (1) (2015) 22-26.

Google Scholar

[10] Indian Institute of Technology Report. Floral and Faunal Diversity in Lower Ganga, Farakka to Gangasagar, GRB EMP: Ganga River Basin Environment Management Plan. Report Code: 027_GBP_IIT_ENB_DAT_04_Ver_June (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] Jindal R. Sharma C. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 2 (2) (2011) 863-872.

Google Scholar

[12] Kumar M. Bhushan B. Assessment of water quality of river Ganga at Shukratal in relation to the potability norms. Bionano Frontier, Eco Revolution Colombo – Sri Lanka (2012) pp.25-29. ISSN 0974-0678.

Google Scholar

[13] Mitra A.K. Indian Journal of Environmental Health 24 (1982) 165-179.

Google Scholar

[14] Morin S., Cordonier A., Lavoie I., Arini A., Blanco S., Duong T.T., Tornés E., Bonet B., Corcoll N., Faggiano L., Laviale M., Pérès F., Becares E., Coste M., Feurtet-Mazel A., Fortin C., Guasch H., Sabater S. Consistency in diatom response to metal-contaminated environments. In: Guasch, H., Ginebreda, A., Geiszinger, A. (eds.), Emerging and Priority Pollutants in Rivers. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2012) pp.117-146.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25722-3_5

Google Scholar

[15] Pandey L.K., Kumar D., Yadav A., Rai J., Gaur J.P. Ecological Indicators 36 (2014) 272-279.

Google Scholar

[16] Pichrtov M., Hajek T., Elster, J. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 89 (2014) 270-280.

Google Scholar

[17] Prygiel J., Coste M., Bukowska J. Review of the major diatom-based techniques for the quality assessment of the rivers – state of the art in Europe. In: Prygiel, J., Whitton, B.A., Bukowska, J. (Eds.), Use of Algae for Biomonitoring Rivers III. Agence de 1_Eau Artois- Picardie, France (1999) p.224–238.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00028033

Google Scholar

[18] Rai L.C. Indian Journal of Fisheries 5 (1) (1978) 1-6.

Google Scholar

[19] Rai L.C., Guar J.P. Algal Adaptation to Environmental Stresses. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg, New York (2001).

Google Scholar

[20] Rimet F. Hydrobiologia 683 (2012) 1-24.

Google Scholar

[21] Sabeena S., Fatma T. Phykos 38 (1&2) (1999) 87-92.

Google Scholar

[22] Roy P.K., Ray D., Pal S., Banerjee G., Majumder A., Mazumdar A. World Applied Sciences Journal 29 (5) (2014) 634-640.

Google Scholar

[23] Sahu B.K., Rao R.J. Behra S.K. Ecology Environment & Conservation 1(1-4) (1994) 35-38.

Google Scholar

[24] Singh N. International Journal of Energy and Environment 1(5) (2010) 823-32.

Google Scholar

[25] Singh A.K., Rai L.C. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 3 (1990) 397-405.

Google Scholar

[26] Singh A.P., Chaudhary B.R. Journal of Algal Biomass Utilization 2 (1) (2011) 21-29.

Google Scholar

[27] Tapia P.M. International Journal of Environmental Health 2 (2008) 82-91.

Google Scholar

[28] Venkateswarlu V., Manikya Reddy P. Algae as biomonitors in river ecology. Proc. Symp. Biological monitoring of the state of Environment. Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi (1985) pp.183-189.

Google Scholar

[29] Vyas L.N., Kumar H.D. Hydrobiologia 31 (1968) 421-434.

Google Scholar