Water Footprint for Garlic under Irrigation Levels and Agrispon Application

Article Preview

Abstract:

Field experiment was conducted in Giza, Egypt, during two growing seasons of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 on garlic crop, with the objective of investigating the effect of different irrigation levels (60, 80 and 100 % of water requirements and their combination with the foliar spraying applications of agrispon (with 0.5 and 1.0 ml/ liter) on growth and yield. The results indicated that increased irrigation level up to 100% led to increased vegetative characters of garlic and that the lowest growth and productivity was obtained by 60% irrigation level. When considering spray application of agrispon; with 1.0 ml/L increased growth and productivity followed by 0.5 ml/L; while control treatment gave the lowest productivity during the both seasons. Interaction effect between irrigation level and agrispon treatments indicated that 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L spray application of agrispon gave the highest garlic productivity followed by 100% irrigation level combined with 0.5 ml/L spray application. The chemical analysis showed that the highest NPK was obtained by 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L agrispon application during the both seasons. Regarding water footprint, the highest irrigation water footprint was obtained by 80% irrigation level followed by 60% irrigation level, while the lowest footprint was obtained by 100% irrigation level due to high garlic productivity under 100% irrigation level. The estimate water footprint for garlic was 525 m3/ton. The blue water footprint for garlic was 422 m3/ton about 80% form total water footprint, while gray water percentage about 20% with value of 103 m3/ton.

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Abd El-Hady, M. and I. E. Ebtisam. 2016. Maximize Crop Water Productivity of Garlic by Modified Fertilizer Management under Drip Irrigation. International J. of ChemTech Research, 5: 144- 150.

Google Scholar

[2] Abdel-Nabi, H. M. A. ; K. K.Dawa ; E. I. El - Gamily. and Y. F. E. Imryed. 2014. Impact of Mineral, Organic and Biofertilization on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cantaloupe J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., Vol. 5(11): 1777 – 1794.

DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2014.64719

Google Scholar

[3] Abdel-Naby, H. M. E. ; K. K. Dawa ; E. E. El-Gamily and N. M. Salem.2012. Effect of mineral, organic fertilization and some foliar application treatments on growth and bulb yield of onion. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., Vol. 3 (8): 2265 - 2276

DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2012.84969

Google Scholar

[4] Ahmed, H.G. (2006). Effect of Irrigation Interval and Weeding Regimes on the Yield of Garlic (Allium sativum L.).Journal of Weed Science,19:290-298.

Google Scholar

[5] Allen, S. E. (1974). Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Black-Well, Oxford, 565.

Google Scholar

[6] Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper nr 56. 300 p. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.

Google Scholar

[7] Anonymous (2012). Agrispon biologically derived stimulant for crop and soil. Agricultural Sciences, Inc., 3227 Garden Brook, Dallas, Texas 75234 USA http://www.agsciinc.com/html/agrispon.html.

Google Scholar

[8] Bagali, A.N.; H.B. Patil; M.B. Guled and R.V. Patil (2012). Effect of scheduling of drip irrigation on growth, yield and water use efficiency of onion (Allium cepa L.). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,25:116-119.

Google Scholar

[9] Chapagain, A. K.; Hoekstra, A. Y.; Savenije, H. H. G. and Gautam, R. (2006): The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries, Ecological Economics, 60(1):186-203.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027

Google Scholar

[10] Chapagain, A. K.; Orr, S., (2009): An improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: A case of Spanish tomatoes. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2) 12191228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.006

Google Scholar

[11] Chapman H. D. and F. Pratt, 1961. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Water.Univ. of Calif., 35: 6 - 7.

Google Scholar

[12] Chapman, H. D. and P. F. Pratt, 1982. Methods of Plant Analysis, I. Methods of Anaylsis for Soil, Plant and Water. Chapman Publishers, Riverside, California, USA.

Google Scholar

[13] El-Dakroury, M. A. 2008. Influence of different irrigation systems and irrigation treatments on productivity and fruit quality of some bean varieties M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agri., Ain Shams University

Google Scholar

[14] Elegba, M.S. and R.I. Rennie (1984). Agrispon: microbiological and elemental analysis and evaluation of its effect on the growth of wheat, barley, field beans and corn. Can. J. Soil Sci., 64: 621-629.

DOI: 10.4141/cjss84-062

Google Scholar

[15] Ezzo M.I.; A.A. Glala, H.A. Habib, A.A. Helaly (2010). Response of sweet pepper grown in sandy and clay soil Lysimeters to water regimes. Amer-Euras J Agric& Environ Sci., 8:18-26.

Google Scholar

[16] FAO, (1980). Soil and plant analysis. Soils Bull. 38, 2–250 (FAO, Rome).

Google Scholar

[17] Gee G.W. and Bauder J.W. (1986) Particle-size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods., Klute A. Ed. Chap. 15. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 383-411.

DOI: 10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15

Google Scholar

[18] Gyanendra, P. M. S., M. Imtiyaz and M.D. Dennis. 2016. Garlic (Allium sativum L.) yield as influenced by different levels of irrigation water by drip irrigation system. International journal of innovation in engineering research & management V: 03 Issue: 01:2348-4918.

Google Scholar

[19] Karaye, A.K. and A.I. Yakubu (2007). Checklist of Weeds in Irrigated Garlic (Allium sativum L.) and Onion (Allium cepa L.) in Sokoto River Valley. Journal of Weed Science, 20 : 53-60.

Google Scholar

[20] Karishma S. , M.S. Arya, U.R. Reshma1 , S.J. Anaswara1 and Syama S. Thampi. 2019. Impact of Plant Growth Regulators on Fruit Production. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci, 8(2): 800-814

Google Scholar

[21] Mandefro, C. and S. Quraishi. 2015. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and water productivity of garlic (Allium sativum L.) under drip irrigation and mulching at wolaitasoddo, Ethiopia. International Journal of Life Sciences, 4: 232-239.

Google Scholar

[22] Mekonnen, M. M. and Hoekstra, A.Y., (2011b): National Water Footprint Accounts: The Green, Blue and Grey Water Footprint of Production and Consumption. Volume 2: Appendices. Delft, The Netherlands, UNESCO-IHE. Value of water, Research Report Series No. 50.

DOI: 10.5194/hessd-8-763-2011

Google Scholar

[23] Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y., (2011a). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 1577–1600.

DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011

Google Scholar

[24] Moustafa, M. M. I.1; M. A. Wally1; K. M. Refaie, and A. H. M. Abd ELWahed. 2017. Effect of different irrigation levels and salicylic acid applications on growth,yield and quality of garlic (Allium Sativum, L.). J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci.12(1): 301-323

Google Scholar

[25] Rakesh K. and S.K. Agarwal.2014. Yield and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by agrispon and fertonic at varying level of fertility. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (4): 166-170.

Google Scholar

[26] Watanabe F. S. and S. R. Olsen, (1965). Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and Na HCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 29: 677-678.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x

Google Scholar

[27] Waller, R. A. and Duncan D. B. 1969. A bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparison problem, J. Am. Stat. Assoc 64, 1484-1504.

Google Scholar

[28] Westerman, R. L. (1990). Soil testing and plant analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison, WI, USA.pp:126

Google Scholar