Assessment of Physico-Chemical Properties of Sediments Collected along the Mahul Creek near Mumbai, India

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present study was performed for the period of one year from January 2013 to December 2013 in order to understand the physico-chemical properties of sediments samples collected along the Mahul Creek of Mumbai. The annual average pH value of the creek sediments was recorded as 5.38. It is feared that such low pH value of sediment might increase the acidity of creek water thereby triggering the heavy metal toxicity which will further reduced survivorship in fish through chronic stress and affect the reproductive partner. The annual average salinity content of the sediment was recorded as 4601.17 ppm. It is important here to note that the high salinity of the sediment may increase the salinity level of creek water which is considered as a major stress factor for most freshwater organisms including crustaceans. The average annual concentration of phosphate in the creek sediment was found to 480.39 ppm. Such high concentration of phosphate in the creek sediments might accelerate the process of eutrophication. From the results it appears that as India moves towards stricter regulation of industrial effluents to control water pollution, greater efforts are required to reduce the risk due to the toxic pollutants which are released into the ecosystems.

Info:

[2011] 5. R.S. Lokhande, P.U. Singare, D.S. Pimple, International Journal of Ecosystem, 1(1), 1-9

Google Scholar

[2011] 6. S.K. Sasamal, K.H. Rao, U.M. Suryavansi, International J. Remote Sensing, 28(19), 4391- 4395 (2007). 7. A. Nagaraju, S. Suresh, K. Killham, K. Hudson-Edward, Turkish J. Eng. Env. Sci., 30(4), 203-219 (2006). 8. T. Rajaram, A. Das, Futures, 40, 56 (2008). 9. M.D. Zingade, M.M. Sabnis, A.V. Mandalia, B.N. Desai, Mahasagar Bull. Natn. Inst. Occeonagr., 13, 99 (1980). 10. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 56-63. 11. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 48-55. 12. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 40-47. 13. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 32-39. 14. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 8-15. 15. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 16-23. 16. P.U. Singare, S.S. Dhabarde, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 3 (2014) 24-31. 17. A. Aghor, 'Chemicals make Thane creek the worst polluted water body'. Daily DNA. August 14, 2007. Mumbai, India. Obtained through the Internet: http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_chemicals-make-thane-creek-the-worst- polluted-waterbody_1115439 [accessed 01/03/2010]. 18. D. Patil, 'A lot's fishy about our creek and lake fish'. Daily Times of India. March 22, 2009. Mumbai, India. Obtained through the Internet: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thane/A-lots-fishy-about-our-creek-and-lake- fish/articleshow/4298566.cms [accessed 01/03/2010]. 19. A. Kumar, Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol., 18, 469 (1996). 20. R.D. Chakravarty, P. Ray, S.B. Singh, Indian J. Fish., 6, 186 (1959). 21. P.V. Hodson, Water quality criteria and the need for biochemical monitoring of contaminant effects on aquatic ecosystem. In: Water Quality Management: Freshwater Ecotoxicity in Australia, B.T. Hart, (ed.), Melbourne Water Studies Center, 7-21 (1986). 22. S.M. Haslam, River pollution: An ecological perspective, Belhaven Press. London; p.253

Google Scholar

[1999] 26. R.S. Lokhande, P.U. Singare, D.S. Pimple, The New York Science Journal, 4(9), 66-71

Google Scholar

[2011] 27. P.U. Singare, Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 12(4), 298-312 (2011). 28. P.U. Singare, R.S. Lokhande, S.S. Bhattacharjee, Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 12(2), 95-107 (2011). 29. P.U. Singare, M.P. Trivedi, R.M. Mishra, American J. Chem., 2(3), 171-180 (2012). 30. P.U. Singare, R.M. Mishra, M.P. Trivedi, Advances in Analytical Chemistry, 2(3), 14-24

DOI: 10.1504/ier.2011.040242

Google Scholar

[2012] 31. P.U. Singare, M.P. Trivedi, R.M. Mishra, Marine Sci., 1(1), 22-29 (2011). 32. P.U. Singare, R.M. Mishra, M.P. Trivedi, Resources and Environment, 1(1), 32-41

Google Scholar

[2011] 33. N. Menounou, B.J. Presley, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 45(1), 11-29 (2003). 34. D.R. Spooner, W. Maher, N. Otway, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 45(1): 92-101

Google Scholar

[2003] 35. S.K. Sahu, P.Y. Ajmal, G.G. Pandit, V.D. Puranik, J. Haz. Mat., 164(2-3), 1573-1579

Google Scholar

[2009] 36. P.U. Singare, M.S. Talpade, D.V. Dagli, V.G. Bhawe, International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 8(2) (2013) 105-112. 37. P.U. Singare, M.S. Talpade, V.G. Bhawe, D.V. Dagli, Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 3(4), 545-551 (2012). 38. A. Verma, S. Balachandran, N. Chaturvedi, V. Patil, Zoos' Print Journal, 19(9), 1599- 1605 (2004). 39. F.H. Rainwater, L.L. Thatchar, 'Methods for Collection and Analysis of Water Samples' U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Papers, 1454, pp.1-301

DOI: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilcpa.13.105

Google Scholar