Using Land Cover Change to Predict Forest Degradation Pressure Points, Eastern Mau Forest, Kenya

Antony Oduya Ndubi

doi:10.56431/p-y474vn

Paper Titles

Effect of Physical and Chemical Factors in Production of Alkaline Protease Enzyme by Bacillus Strains
p.10

Using Land Cover Change to Predict Forest Degradation Pressure Points, Eastern Mau Forest, Kenya
p.17

Evaluation of Natural Minerals (Zeolite and Bentonite) for Nitrogen Compounds Adsorption in Different Water Temperatures Suitable for Aquaculture
p.34

Comparative Evaluation of the Nutrient Composition and Phytochemical Content of Selected Vegetables Consumed in Nigeria
p.43

HomeInternational Letters of Natural SciencesInternational Letters of Natural Sciences Vol. 71Using Land Cover Change to Predict Forest...

Using Land Cover Change to Predict Forest Degradation Pressure Points, Eastern Mau Forest, Kenya

Abstract:

Land cover change in any ecosystem vary in space and time. The study analyzed spatial-temporal land cover change to predict forest degradation pressure points in Eastern Mau Forest Reserve. The study objectives were to determine types and amount of spatial-temporal land cover change; land cover change drivers and; forest resources use sustainability. The study used mixed sample survey design involving purposive sampling of spatial data and cluster sampling of forest resource use data. Primary data included ground control points, field validation data and forest resource use data. Secondary data included Landsat imagery, forest and administration boundaries and settlements data. Analysis was done for 1986-2014 period using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System. The analysis techniques used included object based image segmentation and classification, accuracy assessment and land cover change detection. Land cover types in Eastern Mau Forest consisted of indigenous forest, shrubland, grassland, plantation forest, cultivated fields, bare ground and built-up area. The analysis results depicted that cultivated fields coverage increased from 1% to 47%. Indigenous and plantation forests decreased from 43% to 36% and 34% to 7% respectively. Grassland and shrubland decreased from 16% to 8% and 6% to 2% respectively. Bare ground and built up area had a change of less than 1% each. Causes of pressure that lead to forest degradation included crop cultivation, settlement construction, livestock grazing, charcoal burning, firewood collection, logging, bee keeping and medicinal herbs extraction. Land cover change was more on the eastern side than on the western side. Indigenous and plantation forests were likely to disappear if cropland and built up area expansions were to remain unchecked. The study recommendations were: resettlement activities be eliminated in the Eastern Mau Forest; excision of forest land for crop cultivation should be discouraged; and scientific research should be carried out on sustainable plantation forest activities.

By email View Pdf

Info:

Periodical:

International Letters of Natural Sciences (Volume 71)

Pages:

17-33

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56431/p-y474vn

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2018

Authors:

Antony Oduya Ndubi*

Keywords:

Classification, Eastern Mau Forest, Land Cover, Pressure Points, Satellite Imagery

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] KFWG, Kenya Forests Working Group. Excision and settlement in the Mau Forest. Kenya Forest Working Group report, Nairobi, Kenya, 2001.

Google Scholar

[2] FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. State of the World's Forests (FAO), Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy, 2012.

DOI: 10.47886/9781934874387.ch58

Google Scholar

[3] M. Tiffen, M. Mortimore, F. Gichuki, More people, less erosion: environmental recovery in Kenya, ODI, London, UK, 1994.

DOI: 10.3828/twpr.18.2.aqn5212rw038q312

Google Scholar

[4] KFMP, Kenya Forestry Master Plan Project, Kenya Forestry Master Plan Development Programmes, 1994.

Google Scholar

[5] Adoyo et al., Kenya Political, Social and Environmental Issues, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012.

Google Scholar

[6] M.A. Quaddus, M.A.B. Siddique, Modelling sustainable development planning: a multicriteria decision conferencing approach. Environment International. 27(2-3) (2001) 89-95.

DOI: 10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00066-6

Google Scholar

[7] J.K. Maingi, S.E. Marsh, Assessment of environmental impacts of river basin development on the riverine forests of eastern Kenya using multi-temporal satellite data. Arizona Remote Sensing Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85750, USA, 2001.

DOI: 10.1080/01431160010031298

Google Scholar

[8] BirdLife International, Important Bird Areas factsheet: Mau forest complex, 2015.

Google Scholar

[9] GoK, Report of the Government's Task Force on the Conservation of the Mau Forests Complex, 2009.

Google Scholar

[10] UNEP, How Much Forest Cover in Kenya? A surprisingly difficult question to answer. United Nations Environment Programme, 2012.

Google Scholar

[11] W.G. Sombroek, H.M.H. Braun, B.J.A. van der Pouw, The explanatory soil map and agro-climatic zone map of Kenya. Report No. E. 1, Kenya Soil Survey, Nairobi, Kenya, 1980.

Google Scholar

[12] L.O. Olang, P. Kundu, Land Degradation of the Mau forest complex in Eastern Africa. a review for management and restoration planning, in: Environmental Monitoring, 2011.

DOI: 10.5772/28532

Google Scholar

[13] C. Burnett, T. Blaschke, A multi-scale segmentation/object relationship modelling methodology for landscape analysis, Ecological Modelling. 168 (2003) 233-249.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(03)00139-x

Google Scholar

[14] J. Jenness, J.J. Wynne, Cohen's Kappa and classification table metrics 2.0: An ArcView 3.x extension for accuracy assessment of spatially explicit models. Open-File Report OF 2005-1363. Flagstaff, AZ: US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2005.

DOI: 10.3133/ofr20051363

Google Scholar