Analysis of the Bacterial and Fungal Community Profiles in Bulk Soil and Rhizospheres of Three Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] Genotypes through PCR-DGGE

Article Preview

Abstract:

Each plant species is regarded to substantially influence and thus, select for specific rhizosphere microbial populations. This is considered in the exploitation of soil microbial diversity associated with important crops, which has been of interest in modern agricultural practices for sustainable productivity. This study used PCR-DGGE (polymerase chain reaction - denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) in order to obtain an initial assessment of the bacterial and fungal communities associated in bulk soil and rhizospheres of different mungbean genotypes under natural field conditions. Integrated use of multivariate analysis and diversity index showed plant growth stage as the primary driver of community shifts in both microbial groups while rhizosphere effect was found to be less discrete in fungal communities. On the other hand, genotype effect was not discerned but not inferred to be absent due to possible lack of manifestations of differences among genotypes based on tolerance to drought under non-stressed environment, and due to detection limits of DGGE. Sequence analysis of prominent members further revealed that Bacillus and Arthrobacter species were dominant in bacterial communities whereas members of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were common in fungal communities of mungbean. Overall, fungal communities had higher estimated diversity and composition heterogeneity, and were more dynamic under plant growth influence, rhizosphere effect and natural environmental conditions during mungbean growth in upland field. These primary evaluations are prerequisite to understanding the interactions between plant and rhizosphere microorganisms with the intention of employing their potential use for sustainable crop production.

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Emmerling et al., Functional diversity of soil organisms – a review of recent research activities in Germany, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 165 (2002) 408–420.

DOI: 10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<408::aid-jpln408>3.0.co;2-3

Google Scholar

[2] J. Nesme et al., Back to the future of soil metagenomics, Frontiers in Microbiology. 7 (2016) 1–5.

Google Scholar

[3] J.C. Hunter-Cevera, The value of microbial diversity, Current Opinion in Microbiology. 1(3) (1998) 278–285.

DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5274(98)80030-1

Google Scholar

[4] M.C. Rillig, D.L. Mummey, Mycorrhizas and soil structure, New Phytologist. 171 (2006) 41–53.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x

Google Scholar

[5] M. Van der Heijden, R. Bardgett, N. Van Straalen, The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems, Ecology Letters. 11(3) (2008) 296–310.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x

Google Scholar

[6] P.A. Maron et al., High microbial diversity promotes soil ecosystem functioning, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 84(9) (2018).

Google Scholar

[7] S.M. Hermans et al., Bacteria as emerging indicators of soil condition, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 83(1) (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] L. Avidano et al., Characterization of soil health in an Italian polluted site by using microorganisms as bioindicators, Applied Soil Ecology. 30 (2005) 21–33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] P. Trivedi et al., Response of soil properties and microbial communities to agriculture: implications for primary productivity and soil health indicators, Frontiers in Plant Science. 7(990) (2016).

DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00990

Google Scholar

[10] R.L. Berendsen, C.M. Pieterse, P.A. Bakker, The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health, Trends in Plant Science. 17(8) (2012) 478–486.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001

Google Scholar

[11] G. Berg, K. Smalla, Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere, FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 68(1) (2009) 1–13.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x

Google Scholar

[12] L. Innes, P.J. Hobbs, R.D. Bardgett, The impacts of individual plant species on rhizosphere microbial communities in soils of different fertility, Biology and Fertility of Soils. 40(1) (2004) 7–13.

DOI: 10.1007/s00374-004-0748-0

Google Scholar

[13] P. Garbeva, J.D. van Elsas, J.A. van Veen, Rhizosphere microbial community and its response to plant species and soil history, Plant and Soil. 302(1/2) (2008) 19–32.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9432-0

Google Scholar

[14] P.H. Graham, C.P. Vance, Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use – update on legume utilization, Plant Physiology. 131(3) (2003) 872–877.

DOI: 10.1104/pp.017004

Google Scholar

[15] AVRDC (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center), Counting on beans: mungbean improvement in Asia, UK Aid from the Department of International Development. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b1ced915d3cfd000b38/DFID_impact_case_study_Mungbean_FINAL_1_.pdf.

Google Scholar

[16] N.C. Altoveros, T.H. Borromeo, The state of the plant genetic resources for food and agriculture of the Philippines – a country report (1997–2006), Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry, 2007.

Google Scholar

[17] R.F. Denison, E.T. Kiers, Life histories of symbiotic rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi, Current Biology. 21(18) (2011) R775–R785.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.018

Google Scholar

[18] J. Lalande, R. Villemur, L. Deschênes, A new framework to accurately quantify soil bacterial community diversity from DGGE, Microbial Ecology. 66(3) (2013) 647–658.

DOI: 10.1007/s00248-013-0230-3

Google Scholar

[19] C. Carrigg et al., DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 77(4) (2007) 955–964.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1219-y

Google Scholar

[20] B.M. Duineveld et al., Analysis of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of chrysanthemum via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA as well as DNA fragments coding for 16S rRNA, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 67(1) (2001) 172–178.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.67.1.172-178.2001

Google Scholar

[21] C.H. Nakatsu, Soil microbial community analysis using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, Soil Science Society of America Journal. 71(2) (2007) 562–571.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0080

Google Scholar

[22] G. Muyzer, E.C. de Waal, A.G. Uitterlinden, Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 59(3) (1993) 695–700.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993

Google Scholar

[23] C.H. Nakatsu, V. Torsvik, L. Øvreås, Soil community analysis using DGGE of 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction products, Soil Science Society of America Journal. 64(4) (2000) 1382–1388.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6441382x

Google Scholar

[24] J.K. Brons, J.D. van Elsas, Analysis of bacterial communities in soil by use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and clone libraries as influenced by different reverse primers, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 74(9) (2008) 2712–2727.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.02195-07

Google Scholar

[25] I.C. Anderson, C.D. Campbell, J.I. Prosser, Diversity of fungi in organic soils under a moorland – Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) gradient, Environmental Microbiology. 5(11) (2003) 1121–1132.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00522.x

Google Scholar

[26] R.R. Artz et al., Changes in fungal community composition in response to vegetational succession during the natural regeneration of cutover peatlands, Microbial Ecology, 54(3) (2007) 508–522.

DOI: 10.1007/s00248-007-9220-7

Google Scholar

[27] Google, Experiment site location at Tranca, Bay, Laguna, Philippines [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/maps/place/14%C2%B008'22.4%22N+121%C2%B015'33.7%22E/@14.139559,121.2571773,754m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x0:0x0!7e2!8m2!3d14.1395586!4d121.259366.

Google Scholar

[28] D.A. Del Rosario et al., Adaptation of vegetable legumes to drought stress, in C.G. Kuo (Ed.), Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, 1992, p.360–371.

Google Scholar

[29] F.I. Fatima et al., Microbial DNA extraction from soil by different methods and its PCR amplification, Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 11(1) (2011) 85–90.

Google Scholar

[30] V. Valášková, P. Baldrian, Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis as a fingerprinting method for the analysis of soil microbial communities, Plant, Soil and Environment. 55(10) (2009) 413–423.

DOI: 10.17221/132/2009-pse

Google Scholar

[31] A. Felske et al., Direct ribosome isolation from soil to extract bacterial rRNA for community analysis, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 62(11) (1996) 4162–4167.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4162-4167.1996

Google Scholar

[32] H. Heuer, K. Smalla, Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) for studying soil microbial communities, in: J.D. Van Elsas, E.M.H. Wellington, J.T. Trevors (Eds.), Modern Soil Microbiology, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997, p.353–373.

DOI: 10.1007/springerreference_168321

Google Scholar

[33] M. Gardes, T.D. Bruns, ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts, Molecular Ecology. 2(2) (1993) 113–118.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x

Google Scholar

[34] T.J. White et al., Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, in: M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, T.J. White (Eds.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1990, p.315–322.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

Google Scholar

[35] C.L. Shannon, W. Weaver, The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1963.

Google Scholar

[36] T.A. Hall, BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT, Oxford University Press, Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 41 (1999) 95–98.

Google Scholar

[37] S.F. Altschul et al., Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Research. 25(17) (1997) 3389–3402.

DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

Google Scholar

[38] S. Kumar, G. Stecher, K. Tamura, MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets, Molecular Biology and Evolution. 33(7) (2016) 1870–1874.

DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

Google Scholar

[39] K. Smalla et al., Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 67(10) (2001) 4742–4751.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.67.10.4742-4751.2001

Google Scholar

[40] B. Normander and J.I. Prosser, Bacterial origin and community composition in the barley phytosphere as a function of habitat and presowing conditions, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 66(10) (2000) 4372–4377.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.66.10.4372-4377.2000

Google Scholar

[41] A. Felske et al., Phylogeny of the main bacterial 16S rRNA sequences in Drentse A grassland soils (The Netherlands), Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64(3) (1998) 871-879.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.64.3.871-879.1998

Google Scholar

[42] F. Schwieger, C.C. Tebbe, Effect of field inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33 on the composition of bacterial communities in rhizospheres of a target plant (Medicago sativa) and a non-target plant (Chenopodium album) – linking of 16S rRNA gene-based single-strand conformation polymorphism community profiles to the diversity of cultivated bacteria, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 66(8) (2000) 3556–3565.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.66.8.3556-3565.2000

Google Scholar

[43] N.C.M. Gomes et al., Bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere of maize (Zea mays) grown in tropical soil studied by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis, Plant and Soil. 232 (2001) 167–180.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0566-1_17

Google Scholar

[44] H.E. O'Brien et al., Fungal community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental samples, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71(9) (2005) 5544–5550.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.71.9.5544-5550.2005

Google Scholar

[45] K.T. Konstantinidis, A. Ramette, J.M. Tiedje, The bacterial species definition in the genomic era, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 361(1475) (2006) 1929–1940.

DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1920

Google Scholar

[46] T.R. Scheublin et al., Nonlegumes, legumes and root nodules harbor different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 70(10) (2004) 6240–6246.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.70.10.6240-6246.2004

Google Scholar

[47] N.C.M. Gomes et al., Dynamics of fungal communities in bulk and maize rhizosphere soil in the tropics. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(7) (2003) 3758-3766.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.7.3758-3766.2003

Google Scholar

[48] G. Wang et al., Effect of soil type and soybean genotype on fungal community in soybean rhizosphere during reproductive growth stages, Plant and Soil. 317 (2009) 135–144.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9794-y

Google Scholar

[49] A. Houlden et al., Influence of plant developmental stage on microbial community structure and activity in the rhizosphere of three field crops, FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 65 (2008) 193–201.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00535.x

Google Scholar

[50] Y. Xu et al., Bacterial communities in soybean rhizosphere in response to soil type, soybean genotype, and their growth stage, Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 41 (2009) 919–925.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.027

Google Scholar

[51] A. Sugiyama et al., Changes in the bacterial community of soybean rhizospheres during growth in the field, PLoS One. 9(6) (2014).

Google Scholar

[52] P. Garbeva, J.A. van Veen, J.D. van Elsas, Microbial diversity in soil: selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness, Annual Review of Phytopathology. 42 (2004) 243–270.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455

Google Scholar

[53] J. Swinnen, J.A. Van Veen, R. Merckx, . 14C pulse-labelling of field-grown spring wheat: an evaluation of its use in rhizosphere carbon budget estimations, Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 26(2) (1994) 161–170.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90159-7

Google Scholar

[54] J.M. Chaparro et al., Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions, PLoS One. 8(2) (2013).

DOI: 10.1371/annotation/51142aed-2d94-4195-8a8a-9cb24b3c733b

Google Scholar

[55] O. Inceoğlu et al., Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the betaproteobacterial communities associate with different potato cultivars in two fields, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 76(11) (2010) 3675–3684.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.00040-10

Google Scholar

[56] Q. Tian et al., Land-use types and soil chemical properties influence soil microbial communities in the semiarid Loess Plateau region in China, Scientific Reports. 7(45289) (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/srep45289

Google Scholar

[57] C. Zhao et al., Soil microbial community composition and respiration along an experimental precipitation gradient in a semiarid steppe, Scientific Reports. 6(24317) (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/srep24317

Google Scholar

[58] C.C. Lo, Effect of pesticides on soil microbial community, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B. 45(5) (2010) 348–359.

Google Scholar

[59] A.D. Rovira, Root excretions in relation to the rhizosphere effect, Plant and Soil. 11(1) (1959) 53–64.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01394753

Google Scholar

[60] Z. Rengel, Genetic control of root exudation, Plant and Soil. 245(1) (2002) 59–70.

Google Scholar

[61] J.A. Schweitzer et al., Plant-soil microorganism interactions: heritable relationship between plant genotype and associated soil microorganisms, Ecology. 89(3) (2008) 773–781.

DOI: 10.1890/07-0337.1

Google Scholar

[62] S.A. Micallef, M.P. Shiaris, A. Colon-Carmona, Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates, Journal of Experimental Botany. 60(6) (2009) 1729–1742.

DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp053

Google Scholar

[63] S.A. Micallef et al., Plant age and genotype impact the progression of bacterial community succession in the Arabidopsis rhizosphere, Plant Signaling & Behavior. 4(8) (2009) 777– 780.

DOI: 10.4161/psb.4.8.9229

Google Scholar

[64] Santos-Medellin et al., Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes, American Society for Microbiology. mBio 8:e00764-17 (2017).

DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00764-17

Google Scholar

[65] J.M. Raaijmakers et al., The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms, Plant and Soil. 321(1) (2009) 341-361.

DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6

Google Scholar

[66] A. Kaisermann et al., Fungal communities are more sensitive indicators to non-extreme soil moisture variations than bacterial communities, Applied Soil Ecology. 86 (2015) 158–164.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.10.009

Google Scholar

[67] P.E. Busby et al., Research priorities for harnessing plant microbiomes in sustainable agriculture, PLoS Biology. 15(3) (2017) doi: 10.1371/journal. pbio.2001793.

Google Scholar

[68] J.M. Barea, Future challenges and perspectives for applying microbial biotechnology in sustainable agriculture based on a better understanding of plant-microbiome interactions, Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 15(2) (2015) 261–282.

DOI: 10.4067/s0718-95162015005000021

Google Scholar