The Small-Scale Variation of Herb-Layer Community Structure in a Riparian Mixed Forest

Article Preview

Abstract:

The role of spatial variables, soil properties and overstorey structure in spatial variation of the herb-layer community in a riparian mixed forest was shown. The research were conducted in the "Dnipro-Orils’kiy" Nature Reserve (Ukraine). The research polygon was laid in a forest in the floodplain of the River Protich, which is a left inflow of the River Dnipro. Plant abundance was quantified by measuring cover within experimental polygon. The experimental polygon consisted of 7 transects and each transect was made up of 15 test points. The distance between rows in the site was 3 m. At the site we established a plot of 45×21 m, with 105 subplots of 3×3 m organized in a regular grid. Vascular plant species lists were recorded for each 3×3 m subplot along with visual estimates of species cover projection. The plant community was represented by 43 species, of which 18.6% were phanerophytes, 39.5% were hemikriptophytes, 9.3% were therophytes, 7.0% were geophytes. An overall test of random labelling revealed the total nonrandom distribution of the tree stems within the site. Constrained correspondence analysis (CCA) was applied as ordination approach. The forward selection procedure allowed us to select 6 soil variables, which explain 28.3% of the herb-layer community variability. The list of the important soil variables includes soil mechanical impedance (at the depth 0–5, 30–35, 75–80, and 95–10 cm), soil moisture, and soil bulk density. The variation explained by pure spatial variables is equal to 11.0 %. The majority of the tree-distance structured variation in plant community composition was broad-scaled. The significant relationship was found between the pure spatial component of the community variation and a lot of phytoindicator estimations of which the variability of damping and humidity were of the greatest importance. Trees stand was demonstrated to be a considerable factor structuring both the herb-layer community and spatial variation of the physical properties of soil.

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] O.V. Zhukov, N.L. Gubanova, Dynamic stability of communities of amphibians in short-term-floodedforest ecosystems, Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 23 (2) (2015) 161–171

DOI: 10.15421/011523

Google Scholar

[2] Y. I. Gritsan et al., The catena aspect of the landscape diversity of the «Dnipro-Orilsky» natural reserve, Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology. 28(3) (2019) 417–431

DOI: 10.15421/111939

Google Scholar

[3] O.V. Zhukov, N.L. Gubanova, Diversity and dynamics of amphibians in floodplain ecosystems of the Samara river, Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 23(1) (2015) 66–73

DOI: 10.15421/011510

Google Scholar

[4] C. G. Jones, J. H. Lawton, M. Shachak, Organisms as ecosystem engineers, Oikos. 69 (1994) 373–386

DOI: 10.2307/3545850

Google Scholar

[5] O. Zhukov et al., The effect of soil on spatial variation of the herbaceous layer modulated by overstorey in an Eastern European poplar-willow forest, Ekológia (Bratislava). 38(3) (2019) 353–372

DOI: 10.2478/eko-2019-0020

Google Scholar

[6] A. Burns et al., Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development, The Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology. 10 (2016) 655–664

DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.142

Google Scholar

[7] K. Cottenie, Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics, Ecology Letters. 8 (2005) 1175–1182

DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00820.x

Google Scholar

[8] M. Chudomelová et al., Contrasting patterns of fine-scale herb layer species composition in temperate forests, Acta Oecologica. 80 (2017) 24–31

DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2017.02.003

Google Scholar

[9] E. Laliberte et al., Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest, Oecologia. 159 (2009) 377–388

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1214-8

Google Scholar

[10] A.V. Zhukov, G.A. Zadorozhnaya, Spatio-temporal dynamics of the penetration resistance of recultivated soils formed after open cast mining, Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 24(2) (2016) 324–331

DOI: 10.15421/011642

Google Scholar

[11] O.V. Zhukov et al., Tree canopy affects soil macrofauna spatial patterns on broad- and meso-scale levels in an Eastern European poplar-willow forest in the floodplain of the River Dnipro, Folia Oecologica. 46(2) (2019) 123–136

DOI: 10.2478/foecol-2019-0015

Google Scholar

[12] J. G. Paluch, P. Gruba, Effect of local species composition on topsoil properties in mixed stands with silver fir (Abies alba Mill.), Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 85(3) (2012) 413–426

DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cps040

Google Scholar

[13] D. Binkley, C. Giardina, Why do Tree Species Affect Soils? The Warp and Woof of Tree-soil Interactions, Biogeochemistry. 42(1–2) (1998) 89–106

DOI: 10.1023/A:1005948126251

Google Scholar

[14] L. Blank, Y. Carmel, Woody vegetation patch type determines herbaceous species richness and composition in Mediterranean ecosystem, Community Ecology. 13 (2012) 72–81

DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.1.9

Google Scholar

[15] T.J. Stohlgren, A.J. Owen, M. Lee, Monitoring shifts in plant diversity in response to climate change: a method for landscapes, Biodiversity and Conservation. 9(1) (2000) 65–86

DOI: 10.1023/A:1008995726486

Google Scholar

[16] A. V. Zhukov, Phytoindicator estimation of the multidimensional scaling of the plant community structure, Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University. 1(1) (2015) 69–93

DOI: 10.15421/2015005

Google Scholar

[17] D.Oijen et al., Effects of tree species composition on within‐forest distribution of understorey species, Applied Vegetation Science. 8(2) (2005) 155–166

DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2005.tb00641.x

Google Scholar

[18] P.M. Dixon, Nearest-neighbor contingency table analysis of spatial segregation for several species, Ecoscience. 9(2) (2002) 142–151. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42901478

DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682700

Google Scholar

[19] L.V. Borsukevish, V.A. Onishenko, Moist and occasionally flooded oak-elm forests, in: A.A. Kuzemko et al. (Eds.), National habitat catalogue of Ukraine, FOP Yu.Ia. Klymenko, Kyiv, 2018, p.262–263.

Google Scholar

[20] Y. P. Didukh, The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication, Phytosociocentre, Kyiv, 2011.

Google Scholar

[21] O.V. Zhukov, Influence of usual and dual wheels on soil penetration resistance: the GIS-approach, Biological Bulletin Of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University. 3 (2015) 73–100

Google Scholar

[22] A.V. Zhukov et al., Geostatistical estimation of soil aggregate structure as a composite variable, Biological Bulletin. 3 (2015) 101–121

Google Scholar

[23] V. M. Yakovenko, J.J. Dubinina, Y.O. Zhukova, Spatial heterogeneity of the physical properties of the soil in the floodplain of the small river, Agrology. 2(4) (2019) 219‒228

Google Scholar

[24] Ch. F. Damgaard, K. M. Irvine, Using the beta distribution to analyse plant cover data, Journal of Ecology. 107 (2019) 2747– 2759

DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13200

Google Scholar

[25] R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2019. URL https://www.R–project.org/.

Google Scholar

[26] A. M., Thieler, R. Fried, J. Rathjens, RobPer: An R Package to Calculate Periodograms for Light Curves Based on Robust Regression, Journal of Statistical Software. 69(9) (2016) 1–36

DOI: 10.18637/jss.v069.i09

Google Scholar

[27] A. Canty, & B. Ripley boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-20, 2017.

Google Scholar

[28] C. J. F. Ter Braak, Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis, Ecology. 67 (1986) 1167–1179

DOI: 10.2307/1938672

Google Scholar

[29] F.G. Blanchet, P. Legendre, D. Borcard, Forward selection of explanatory variables, Ecology. 89(9) (2008) 2623–2632

DOI: 10.1890/07-0986.1

Google Scholar

[30] D. Borcard, P. Legendre, All–scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices, Ecological Modelling. 153 (2002) 51–68

DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4

Google Scholar

[31] P. Legendre, L. Legendre, Numerical Ecology. Third English Edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, NL., 2012.

Google Scholar

[32] L.-W. Chang et al., Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche-and dispersal-based processes in community assembly, Ecology. 94 (2013) 2145–2151

DOI: 10.1890/12-2053.1

Google Scholar

[33] O.V. Zhukov et al., Diversity and phytoindication ability of plant community, Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 7(4) (2017) 81–99

DOI: 10.15421/2017_90

Google Scholar

[34] J. Oksanen et al., Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-2, 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

Google Scholar

[35] C.J.F. ter Braak, I.C. Prentice, A theory of gradient analysis, Advances in Ecological Research. 18 (1988) 271–317

DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60183-X

Google Scholar

[36] S. Dray et al., adespatial: Multivariate Multiscale Spatial Analysis. R package version 0.3-2, 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=adespatial

Google Scholar

[37] M. De la Cruz, Metodos para analizar datos puntuales, in: F. T. Maestre, A. Escudero, A. Bonet (Eds.), Introduccion al Analisis Espacial de Datos en Ecologia y Ciencias Ambientales: Metodos y Aplicaciones, Asociacion Espanola de Ecologia Terrestre, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos y Caja de Ahorros del Mediterraneo, Madrid, 2008, pp.76-127.

DOI: 10.4185/rlcs-2016-1142

Google Scholar

[38] A. Baddeley, R. Turner, Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns, Journal of Statistical Software. 12 (2005) 1–42

DOI: 10.18637/jss.v012.i06

Google Scholar

[39] A.V. Smagin et al., Some criteria and estimation methods of soil ecological conditions regards to greenery of urban areas, Soil Sciences. 5 (2006) 603–615.

Google Scholar

[40] F. S. Gilliam, The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems, Bioscience. 57 (2007) 845–858

DOI: 10.1641/B571007

Google Scholar

[41] T. Dallas, J. M. Drake, Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities, Ecosphere. 5(9) (2014) 104

DOI: 10.1890/ES14-00071.1

Google Scholar

[42] E. Weiher et al., Advances, challenges and a developing synthesis of ecological community assembly theory, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 366 (2011) 2403–2413

DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0056

Google Scholar

[43] T. Standovár et al., Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness, Community Ecology. 7(2) (2006) 199–209

DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.2.7

Google Scholar

[44] O.V. Zhukov, O. M. Kunah, Y.Y. Dubinina, Sensitivity and resistance of communities: evaluation on the example of the influence of edaphic, vegetation and spatial factors on soil macrofauna, Biosystems Diversity. 25(4) (2017) 328–341

DOI: 10.15421/011750

Google Scholar

[45] G. von Oheimb, W. Härdtle, Selection harvest in temperate deciduous forest: impact on herb layer richness and composition, Biodiversity and Conservation. 18(2) (2009) 271–287

DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9475-4

Google Scholar

[46] S. Barbier, F. Gosselin, P. Balandier, Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved – A critical review for temperate and boreal forests, Forest Ecology and Management. 254 (2008) 1–15

DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038

Google Scholar

[47] P. Zinke, The Pattern of Influence of Individual Forest Trees on Soil Properties, Ecology. 43(1) (1962) 130–133

DOI: 10.2307/1932049

Google Scholar

[48] S. Bratton, Resource division in an understory herb community: responses to temporal and microtopographic gradients, The American Naturalist. 110(974) (1976) 679–693. www.jstor.org/stable/2459584.

DOI: 10.1086/283097

Google Scholar

[49] D. Breshears et al., Overstory-Imposed Heterogeneity in Solar Radiation and Soil Moisture in a Semiarid Woodland, Ecological Applications. 7(4) (1997) 1201-1215

Google Scholar

[50] E. Andivia et al., Tree patch distribution drives spatial heterogeneity of soil traits in cork oak woodlands, Annals of Forest Science. 72 (2015) 549–559

DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0475-8

Google Scholar

[51] S. Burrascano, F. M. Sabatini, & C. Blasi, Testing indicators of sustainable forest management on understorey composition and diversity in southern Italy through variation partitioning, Plant Ecology. 212 (2011) 829–841

DOI: 10.1007/s11258-010-9866-y

Google Scholar

[52] F. C. Nettesheim et al., Environment is more relevant than spatial structure as a driver of regional variation in tropical tree community richness and composition, Plant Ecology & Diversity. 11(1) (2018) 1755–1774

DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2018.1473520

Google Scholar

[53] J. M. Chase, Spatial scale resolves the niche versus neutral theory debate, Journal of Vegetation Science. 25 (2014) 319–322

DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12159

Google Scholar

[54] L.E. Frelich, J.L. Machado, P.B. Reich, Fine scale environmental variation and structure of understorey plant communities in two old growth pine forests, Journal of Ecology. 91 (2003) 283–293

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00765.x

Google Scholar

[55] M. Aiba, H. Takafumi, T. Hiura, Interspecific differences in determinants of plant species distribution and the relationships with functional traits, Journal of Ecology. 100 (2012) 950–957

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01959.x

Google Scholar

[56] J. Karst, B. Gilbert, M.J. Lechowicz, Fern community assembly: the roles of chance and the environment at local and intermediate scales, Ecology. 86 (2005) 2473–2486

DOI: 10.1890/04-1420

Google Scholar

[57] P. Legendre et al., Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broadleaved forest of China, Ecology. 90 (2009) 663–674

DOI: 10.1890/07-1880.1

Google Scholar

[58] S. P. Hubbell, The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 2001.

Google Scholar

[59] O.N. Kunah, Functional and spatial structure of the urbotechnozem mesopedobiont community, Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 24(2) (2016) 473–483

DOI: 10.15421/011664

Google Scholar

[60] A. Gazol, R. Ibanez, Plant species composition in a temperate forest: Multi-scale patterns and determinants, Acta Oecologica. 36 (2010) 634–644

DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2010.09.009

Google Scholar

[61] H. Tuomisto, K. Ruokolainen, M. Yli-Halla, Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of Western Amazonian forests, Science. 299 (2003) 241–244

DOI: 10.1126/science.1078037

Google Scholar

[62] J. G. Pausas, M. P. Austin, Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal, Journal of Vegetation Science. 12 (2001) 153–166

DOI: 10.2307/3236601

Google Scholar

[63] J. Lyon, W.E. Sharpe, Impacts of hay-scented fern on nutrition of northern red oak seedlings, Journal of Plant Nutrition. 26(3) (2003) 487–502

DOI: 10.1081/PLN-120017661

Google Scholar

[64] O. M. Kunah et al., The temporal dynamics of readily available soil moisture for plants in the technosols of the Nikopol Manganese Ore Basin, Biosystems Diversity. 27(2) (2019) 156–162

DOI: 10.15421/011921

Google Scholar

[65] Z. Lososová et al., Phylogenetic structure of plant species pools reflects habitat age on the geological time scale, Journal of Vegetation Science. 26 (2015) 1080–1089

DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12308

Google Scholar

[66] E.L. Greacen, D.A. Farrell, B. Cockroft, Soil resistance to metal probes and plant roots, Transactions of the 9th Congress of the International Society of Soil Science. 1 (1968) 769–779.

Google Scholar

[67] V.V. Medvedev, Soil penetration resistance, Gorodskaya Tipografiya, Kharkov, 2009.

Google Scholar

[68] Y. Canton al., Aggregate stability in range sandy loam soils Relationships with runoff and erosion, Catena. 77 (2009) 192–199

DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2008.12.011

Google Scholar

[69] D.A. Angers, J. Caron, Plant-induced Changes in Soil Structure: Processes and Feedbacks, Biogeochemistry. 42(1–2) (1998) 55–72

DOI: 10.1023/A:1005944025343

Google Scholar

[70] A. Siefert al., Scale dependence of vegetation-environment relationships: a meta-analysis of multivariate data, Journal of Vegetation Science. 23 (2012) 942–951

DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01401.x

Google Scholar

[71] J. Rinklebe, U. Langer, Microbial diversity in three floodplain soils at the Elbe River (Germany), Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 38(8) (2006) 2144–2151

Google Scholar

[72] K. Wälder, O. Wälder, J. Rinklebe, J. Menz, Estimation of soil properties with geostatistical methods in floodplains, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 54(3) (2008) 275–295.

DOI: 10.1080/03650340701488485

Google Scholar