Biogas as Resources of Energy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of the study described the importance of biogas and its importance. The biogas generally obtained from the waste. The so-called wastes that we discard and suffer with the consequences of improper management are of course partly huge energy and fertilizer sources that can support energy demands of cities greatly. Urban waste disposal is a serious challenge in all cities in the developing world, and its accumulation is an additional health hazard. Reliable and generally accepted disposal of the comparatively large amounts of digestate produced is necessary if biogas production is to be implemented. In this regard's discussion has been about the biogas production reaction involves, design and applications

Info:

Pages:

1-14

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Agstar. 2004. AgSTAR Handbook: A Manual for Developing Biogas Systems at Commercial Farms in the United States. Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Restoration Group Inc.

Google Scholar

[2] Ahring, B.K. 1994. Status on Science and Application of Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion. Water Sci Tech 30(12): 241-249.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1994.0619

Google Scholar

[3] Anaerobic Digesters: Design and Operation. Bulletin 827, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Agriculture, Agriculture Experiment Station. University Park, PA.

Google Scholar

[4] Anon. 2005. Fuels for Fuel Cells. National Fuel Cell Research Center. Available online at: http://www.nfcrc.uci.edu/fcresources/FCexplained/Fuels.htm. Date accessed: August 12, 2005.

Google Scholar

[5] Barker, J.C. 2001. Methane Fuel Gas from Livestock Wastes: A Summary Publication No. EBAE 071-80, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service.

Google Scholar

[6] Belloso O.M., Fortuny R.S. 2011. Food Preservation Technology: advances in fresh-cut fruits and vegetables processing. 1-5.

DOI: 10.1201/b10263

Google Scholar

[7] Bitir, I., Tazerout, M. and Le Corre, O. 2002. Optimal Use of the Generated Biogas from Manure. Paper No. 387-395 in Proceedings of the World Congress of Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.8357

Google Scholar

[8] Brandon, R. 2002. The Power of New Technology: Microturbines. Natural Resources Canada. CANMET Energy Technology Centre, Nepean, ON.

Google Scholar

[9] Capstone. 2005. Capstone C30 Product Datasheet. Capstone Turbine Corporation, Chatsworth, CA.

Google Scholar

[10] Cristiani-Urbani, E., Netzahuatl-Munoz, A. R., Manriquez-Rojas, F. J., Juarez-Ramirez, C., Ruiz-Ordaz, N., and Galindez-Mayer, J. 2000 Batch and fed-batch cultures for the treatment of whey with mixed yeast cultures. Proc. Biochem. 35, 649-657.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-9592(99)00116-8

Google Scholar

[11] Demirel, B., Yenigun, O., and Onay, T. T. 2005. Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review. Proc. Biochem. 40, 2583-2595.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.12.015

Google Scholar

[12] Earth Tech. 2002. Waste-Based Energy Feasibility Study. Report submitted to Municipality of Chatham-Kent. Project No. 55484, Earth Tech Canada Inc. Markham, ON.

Google Scholar

[13] El-Mashad, H.M., Zeeman, G., van Loon, W.K.P., Bot, G.P. and Lettinga, G. 2004. Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresource Tech. 95: 191-201.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.07.013

Google Scholar

[14] Fisher, J. R., Iannotti, E. L., & Fulhage, C. D. 1983. Production of methane gas from combinations of wheat straw and swine manure. Trans. Am. Soc. Agricult. Eng. 26, 546-548.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.33976

Google Scholar

[15] Gally, A. E. 1996. A comparative study of anaerobic digestion of acid cheese whey and dairy manure in a two-stage reactor. Biores. Tech. 58, 61-72.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(96)00105-8

Google Scholar

[16] Gelegenis, J., Georgakakis, D., Angelidaki, I., & Mavris, V. 2007. Optimization of biogas production by co-digestion whey with diluted poultry manure. Renew. Energy 32, 2147-2160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.11.015

Google Scholar

[17] Ingersoll-Rand. 2003. Biogas-to-Energy Systems for Anaerobic Digesters. Ingersoll- Rand Company, Davidson, NC.

Google Scholar

[18] Kacprzak, A., Krzystek, L., & Ledakowicz, S. 2010. Co-digestion of agricultural and industrial wates. Chem. Pap. 64, 127-131.

DOI: 10.2478/s11696-009-0108-5

Google Scholar

[19] Kramer, J. 2002. Agricultural Biogas Casebook. Submitted to Great Lakes Regional Biomass Energy Program. Resource Strategies, Inc. Madison, WI.

Google Scholar

[20] Kushwaha, J. P., Srivastava, V. C., & Mall, I. D. 2010 Organics removal from dairy wastewater by electrochemical treatment and residue disposal. Sep. and Purif. Technol. 76, 198-205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.10.008

Google Scholar

[21] Memon M., Memon K.S., Mirani S., Jamro G.M. 2012 Comparative evaluation of organic wastes for improving maize growth and NPK Content. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11: 39: 9343-9349.

DOI: 10.5897/ajb12.004

Google Scholar

[22] Minott, S, Scott, N. and Aldrich, B. 2004. Feasibility Study of Fuel Cells for Biogas Energy Conversion on Large Dairy Farms. NSERDA. Technical Note FC-1.

Google Scholar

[23] NRC. 2002. The Power of New Technology – Microturbines. Natural Resources Canada – CANMET Energy Technology Centre.

Google Scholar

[24] NSTAR. 2005. Distributed Generation: Reciprocating Engines, Microturbines, Fuel Cells, Stirling Engines and Photovoltaics. NSTAR. Platts, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Google Scholar

[25] Persson, S.P.E., Bartlett, H.D., Branding, A.E., and Regan, R.W. 1979. Agricultural Pos, J., teBoekhorst, R., Eaton, D., Walczak, B. and Pavlicik, V. 1981. Biogas Production From Animal Manure and Crop Residues & Processes, Procedure and Design. Technical Report 126-59, 1981.

Google Scholar

[26] Poulsen, T.G. 2003. Anaerobic Digestion. Solid Waste Management, Ch. 5. Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Google Scholar

[27] Price E.C. a nd Cheremisinoff, P.N. 1981. Biogas: Production & Utilization. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI.

Google Scholar

[28] Rajeshwari, K. V., Balakrishnan, B., Kansal, A., Lata, K., & Kishore, V. V. N. (2000). State-of-art of anaerobic digetion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renew. and Sustain. Energy Rev. 4, 135-156.

DOI: 10.1016/s1364-0321(99)00014-3

Google Scholar

[29] Rao, M.S., Singh, S.P. 2004 Bioenergy conversion of organic fraction of MSW: kinetic studies and gas yield-organic loading relationships for process optimization. Bioresource Tech. 95: 173-185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.013

Google Scholar

[30] Regassa N., Sundaraa R.D., Seboka B.B. 2011. Challenges and opportunities in municipal solid waste management: The case of Addis Ababa city, central Ethiopia. J. Human Ecol. 33(3): 179-190.

DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2011.11906358

Google Scholar

[31] Six, J., Frey, S.D., Thiet, R.K., Batten, K.M., 2006. Bacterial and fungal contributions to C-sequestration in agro ecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 555-569.

DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347

Google Scholar

[32] Spece, R. E., 1999. Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Tech. 23, 1259-1264.

Google Scholar

[33] Waldrop, M., Firestone, M.K., 2004. Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities. Oecologia 138, 275-284.

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1419-9

Google Scholar

[34] Wellinger, A. and Lindberg, A. 2001. Biogas Upgrading and Utilisation. IEA Bioenergy. Task 24: Energy from biological conversion of organic waste.

Google Scholar

[35] Willingham, M. and Pipattanasomporn, M. 2003. The Role of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) in Virginia's Energy Future. Alexandria Research Institute. Alexandria, VA.

Google Scholar

[36] Wiltsee, G. and Emerson, H. 2004. Clean Power From Microturbines Using Biogas. Biocycle Feb. 45(2): 53-55.

Google Scholar

[37] Yadvika, Santosh, Sreekrishnan, T.R., Kohli, S., Rana, V. 2004 Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques – a review. Bioresource Tech. 95: 1-10. ( Received 15 January 2014; accepted 21 January 2014 )

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.010

Google Scholar